Post 01:
My dad sends me superhero click-bait articles constantly. I don't mind he sends them, but it's fans speculating to get views to their website. We could start writing articles based on things we read, it'd be just as credible. It's ok if he has fun reading it, but not legitimate.
Post 02:
When I explained to my dad he sends click-bait almost everyday, he got sad. There's nothing to be sad about. Should I educate him to not read dirt sheets and accept it as fact? Or should I let him blissfully have fun reading his superhero articles and pretend I enjoy them too?
Post 03:
What is fact? What is reality? A sketchy click-bait website can make up stories for their website. I think most people comprehend that's nonsense. But when the "credible" media does it, it's taken as "fact." People can nefariously try rewriting history and reality. What's truth?
Post 04:
Most people are intellectually lazy. They'll take a paragraph they read on social media and accept it as fact. This "fact" might be lies, defamation being spread to ruin an innocent person. Most people don't care. They don't do the research. They believe a random post online.
Post 05:
Hypothetically speaking, if the U.S.A., big tech, and the media began conspiring to silence and defame somebody... You could have Mr. Innocent, the son of God on trial... They could portray the poster child for purity and innocence as "Satan" and there'd be nothing they could do.
Post 06:
Sometimes to portray somebody innocent as "Satan" in the media is a more sensational news story. It's more profitable. The lies and narrative are set. The intellectually lazy repeat the lies that are being spread. It could even be a conspiracy from the top to sabotage a person.
Post 07:
Take innocent pro wrestling for example. If I went to a house show, watched a dark match, and told all the dirt sheets an up-and-coming wrestler used an unusual ring name, then they all report it as fact. Eventually, Wikipedia will report the made-up name as fact too. It's a lie!
No comments:
Post a Comment